If you are considering a dental practice appraisal, here are some interesting industry statistics:
There are over 133,000 privately owned dental practices in the US alone, classified under the SIC 8021 and NAICS 6212. Dental practices are a large part of health services and generate around $104B in annual revenues growing annually at 11.6%.
Yet an average dental practice is a small service business – employing a staff of 6 – 7 and producing some $787,000 in annual sales. Revenue per employee is about $119,000. Dental practices employ some 882,700 staff.
Dental practice valuation methods – comparable practice sales
Practice sales happen regularly so there are plenty of comparable data to use for valuing a dental practice. There are a number of valuation multiples to choose from, each giving you a different way to determine the practice value. Here are the top ones most often used to price a dental practice for sale:
Surprised by this list? Well, the traditional way to assess a dental practice value has relied upon the net sales or gross annual revenues. However, the market for dental practices is quite dynamic and pricing trends change over time.
We keep an eye on the spread of actual practice selling prices from the average. This is handily captured by the coefficient of variation – the smaller this number the tighter the selling prices cluster around the mean. If you want to estimate your practice value, use the valuation multiples with the smallest coefficient of variation first. This means that practice buyers out in the market rely on these multiples more often when pricing acquisitions.
Recent dental practice sales data show that the gross profit based valuation multiples can give you the most accurate estimate of current practice value. In fact, its coefficient of variation is just 0.39 compared to 2.39 for the net sales based multiple.
Example: How to price a dental practice using multiples
Consider an average private dental practice generating $300,000 in annual net sales, having a gross profit of $275,000; discretionary cash flow of $100,000; and market value of all invested capital, which includes the practice assets and long-term liabilities, of $85,000.
Let’s take reasonable values of the respective valuation multiples for use in our value calculations:
Sale price to gross profit: 0.7.
Sale price to total invested capital: 2.
Sale price to net sales: 0.6.
Sale price to discretionary cash flow: 1.7.
Applying these valuation multiples gives us the following practice value estimates:
Based on gross profit: $192,500.
Based on total invested capital: $170,000.
Based on net sales: $180,000.
Based on discretionary cash flow: $170,000.
This gives us the average practice value of $178,125.
By convention of professional practice appraisals, the value includes all tangible assets and practice goodwill. It does not include cash, accounts receivable, liabilities or real estate. The value of earnouts set aside as a contingent part of the selling price, if present, is also excluded.
Recent sales of private dental practices are an excellent source for estimating your practice value. See how to value a dental practice based on its gross revenues, net sales, profits, EBITDA, cash flow and assets.
In the real world comparisons rule. We compare products, services, features and prices all the time. Price per square foot is the yard stick used by the real estate industry to compare properties. In a world of substitutes it seems there is always the next best thing out there.
But how about this: can you compare a one of a kind painting by a famed artist to somebody else’s work? Probably not. Reason is simple: a work of art is not the same as another. There are no substitutes for the real thing.
In business valuation, the situation may be quite complex as well. While many companies can be compared to their industry peers, some businesses are unique enough to defy comparison.
Imagine, for example, comparing Google to figure out its value in the early 2000’s before the company went public. There were no other businesses who offered the kind of search engine technology Google became famous for. If you tried to use market comparisons, you’d be matching the proverbial apples and oranges.
Indeed, professional appraisers know that market based comparisons may be misleading. After all, each business is unique. It is precisely its specific value set of drivers that determine its true value. Things like technology, business relations, skills of the company’s staff, and relationship with its customers tend to play a significant role in how it competes. No two businesses are ever the same.
Yet market comparison is based on the simple assumption that businesses operating in the same industry are interchangeable. If you know the selling price of several companies out there, you can estimate the value of your firm. Well, yes and no.
Market comps are good for initial business value estimates. It is easy to see how valuation multiples you get from sold businesses can be applied to your company’s revenue, asset base, EBITDA or net income to figure out what your company may be worth.
Market evidence is also useful if your business valuation comes under fire. Examples are legal disputes, or challenges by the tax authorities. If you can furnish proof of companies’ selling prices, your business value analysis gains support from the actual market place.
However, as the saying goes, there are lies, damn lies, and statistics. Market valuation is based on statistics collected either by yourself or someone else. The stats may be very misleading, depending on who and how collects and analyzes the market data.
Private business sales data is a case in point. Usually, such data is collected on a voluntary basis by business brokers. Only a fraction of the actual business sales ever get disclosed to the business sale data vendors.
Business people and brokers are not required to report private company sales to anyone. Most of such sales never get reported. Business owners may consider their acquisition strategy highly competitive. Brokers may view their knowledge of the market place as a key advantage and keep their deal statistics to themselves. What you see is just a sliver of the actual deal flow.
In addition, most business brokers are not financial reporting experts. Be wary of the financial numbers as they are not reviewed, let alone audited by a financial accounting professional. That is one reason private business financials require adjustment or normalization before you can value a company.
For these reasons, many business appraisal experts tend to approach the market valuation methods with caution. One way to get better quality data is to examine small cap public companies or private company acquisition deals done by public firms. Such transactions must be reported to the authorities, such as the US Securities and Exchange Commission, under law. In addition, the financial numbers must comply with the standard GAAP format and be audited by licensed accountants.
So your comparison is more likely to be “apples to apples”. But what about the difference between the public and private companies? Business appraisers use the discount for lack of marketability to adjust the valuation multiples from public company sources. Fortunately for your business valuation, the difference is visible in the market place – just check the prices of restricted company stock and freely marketable shares of the same firm. This measure of price reduction gives you an idea how much the investors discount the value of assets that have limited marketability.
Remember that market comparison is but one approach to business value. To uncover what your company is really worth, you need to apply the various methods under the income and asset approaches. In particular, the income valuation helps you delve into the value drivers that create business value. This type of analysis is as unique as the company itself.
Ask any professional business appraiser and you will get an earful about the financial statements, adjustments and the true economic income estimation. Why all the fuss?
In a perfect world, you should be able to figure out business value by just using the company’s financial statements. After all, don’t the income statements and balance sheet capture the company’s financial performance? It turns out, not quite.
If you are not a seasoned accountant, here is a quick rundown on how financial numbers are reported for businesses. In the US, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that all public companies prepare and file financial statements in accordance with the so-called generally acceptable accounting principles, known as GAAP.
Trouble is, there is no one place you can go to in order to understand what GAAP is all about. So accountants have developed a de-facto understanding of GAAP that they all follow. Even though the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) sets the rules, it is the practicing CPAs that interpret GAAP and file the financials with the SEC.
Now, the foundation of GAAP is known as historical cost. One key point for business valuation is that only the assets the company paid for are recorded on the books. CPAs can then trace all such recorded assets to the original purchase invoice. The system functions quite well as long as the assets are in tangible form such as the real property, machinery, office equipment and furniture. If it comes to an audit, you can find the actual physical assets and trace them all the way back to the original purchase invoice.
GAAP misses the value of intangible assets
So far, so good. If the prices of assets change slowly over time, and inflation is kept under control, the system works well. But what if your company is rich in intangible assets such as intellectual property? The patented software developed by the internal R & D may be the most valuable asset your company owns. Yet, it is not a tangible asset purchased from a vendor. So there is no real book record for it!
What do you think is more valuable from a company investor’s perspective? Office furniture or highly prized software design that generates sales?
In many companies today, the value of such intellectual property far exceeds the value of all the tangible assets combined.
GAAP cost basis misses the market value
Clearly, GAAP financial reporting misses a key point when it comes to business value. The standard was developed in an industrial age when dealing with intangible assets was not an issue. Under GAAP the best you can do is capitalize the cost incurred in developing your patented technology, but not its market value!
Financials are normalized for business appraisal
Correcting this picture in order to determine the company’s true market value is the job for business appraisers. One method that stands out is the asset accumulation technique. You start with the company’s cost basis balance sheet and normalize it by adding the values of assets and liabilities that are missing. The result is an economic balance sheet, one that captures the market values of all assets, whether they have an accounting cost basis or not.
GAAP serves the needs of CPAs who are conservative by nature. As long as the system allows the accountants to do their job well, they are happy. But when it comes to business appraisal, you need to make adjustments that reveal the true value of the company.
What type of business earnings do you use in private business valuation? The difference could be huge, the results misleading.
Public or private, business value is about returns at a level of risk you can accept. Risk is typically captured in the form of discount or capitalization rates. You can calculate these by using the well-known CAPM or Build-up models. But before you can run your business valuation calculations, the business earnings need to be estimated.
If you pick the discounted cash flow method, the earnings need to be forecast over some future time period, usually several years. Capitalization calls for just one earnings number that should represent the company’s earnings outlook.
Are accounting multiples good enough?
But what type of earnings should you choose in your calculations? The choices are many and confusing. If you look at typical market based valuations for public companies, valuation multiples based on the accounting metrics abound. Price to EBIT, EBITDA, net income, gross revenues or net sales are common.
Private business valuations: Addbacks, normalizations
The reason is that privately owned companies do not need to comply with financial reporting standards, like GAAP or IFRS, unlike the public firms. So one company’s EBITDA may very well be different from another business.
Public firms maximize earnings; private firms minimize taxable income
Creative financial management aside, private businesses pursue very different financial goals from their publicly traded counterparts. While a public company strives to maximize its stock price, and, therefore, earnings per share; the private business owners are mainly concerned with minimizing taxable income.
Private companies don’t pay taxes – the owners do
Private businesses are generally organized as the so-called pass through entities, such as the S-corporations or LLCs in the USA. The companies do not pay taxes, the owners do as individuals. This also helps minimize business taxes as the owners may have additional expenses they can offset against business income to reduce taxes.
Public firms do this by moving operations into tax advantaged geographies, or getting major tax breaks from local governments in return for sizable investments in their communities. If you are a typical small business owner, this is not the game you can play.
Aggressive depreciation skews the earnings for private businesses
A private business has the additional benefit of accelerating asset depreciation. This allows business owners to recover costs quickly. However, it skews the actual asset use and reinvestment picture. Your EBITDA may be affected by such ‘paper expenses’, the D and A in this acronym.
In contrast, public companies are under constant scrutiny by the government. They must clearly demonstrate how they use the invested capital in order to inform their investors properly. The result is typically a much more realistic picture of asset depreciation.
Friends and family borrowing is not commercial terms
Interest expense is also tricky. Private companies may borrow from family members, friends, or business owners themselves on the terms not available in the public market. Public companies borrow money from commercial lenders. Invariably, the terms of such loans represent the current market conditions.
When you compare publicly traded companies, you can review their financial statements that have been prepared by professional accountants, subjected to an audit, and are in compliance with the GAAP (Generally acceptable accounting principles). This is generally not the case for privately owned firms.
Moral: Use Net Cash Flow and Seller’s Discretionary Earnings
As a result, accounting measures of income such as EBITDA or EBIT are not suitable in private business valuations. The business earnings need to be normalized in order to reveal the company’s actual economic potential. The normalization process enables you to establish the company’s earning power. Given your risk assessment, you now have all the inputs required to conduct an accurate and realistic business appraisal.
If you ever valued a private company, you probably ran across the venerable Multiple of Discretionary Earnings business valuation method. This technique is perhaps the most common in valuing owner-operator managed businesses. Its appeal is simplicity and excellent coverage of value factors that demonstrate what creates business value and how you can improve operations in order to increase business worth.
As this example shows, the Multiple of Discretionary Earnings method lets you assess the company across a set of key financial and operational performance factors. You score the business on each factor, input a set of financial figures, and the method calculates both the earnings multiple and the overall business value.
Better run, more profitable businesses generally command higher selling prices in the market. The Multiple of Discretionary Earnings method captures this trend very well. For example, you may ask the questions:
How much is business value affected by the stability of business earnings over time?
Is the quality of management team important to business value?
What is the effect of customer concentration on the company’s valuation?
Is a business with efficient, well documented business practices more valuable?
The method lets you answer all these questions and more. Importantly, you can spot weaknesses and opportunities to see how much your business value would increase if you made improvements. A great way to make strategic decisions that translate into a greater business value!
But one question remains. Just how high do the earnings multiples get in the ‘real world’? Is there a reasonable range of Seller’s Discretionary Earnings multiples a private business can actually sell for?
This brings us to the area of statistical data analysis. One way you can answer this important question is by studying comparable business sales. You can relate the actual business selling prices to earnings and calculate the earnings multiples observed in the market place.
Conventional wisdom tells us that private businesses tend to sell for somewhere between 0.1 and 4 times the SDE (Seller’s Discretionary Earnings). However, if you analyze the business sales data, you will discover that the range is quite a bit wider.
True enough, close to 90% of private businesses do sell for earnings multiples in the range of 0.1 to 4. But the upper 10% defy this trend.
Indeed, the top 10% of private businesses can price above 50 times the SDE. If you visualize the earnings multiple trend versus the percentile of sold businesses, the graph starts out smoothly, reaching the multiple of 4 for a 90% business sale percentile. Thereafter, the graph trends sharply up, reaching beyond 50 times the SDE for the top 1% of all businesses sold.
This is perhaps an interesting demonstration of the 10% – 90% statistical adage. The highest 90% of the earnings multiples are commanded by the top 10% of all businesses.
What are the reasons for such dramatic differences in selling multiples? Here are some we have noted:
Successful businesses at the top of their game command much higher valuation multiples than their peers.
The best businesses attract the bulk of business buyers and investors who bid up the selling prices competitively.
The top performing companies have the best earnings growth prospects, which directly affect their value.
One statistical reason often overlooked is that in some industries business sales are priced on other measures of financial performance or condition. For example, high technology companies are often acquired based on their assets, especially intellectual property; or their gross revenues.
The earnings multiples could be very high if these companies have not yet been optimized for peak profitability. The acquiring entity, typically a large corporation, may have a very different vision for profitability using its own economies of scale, market access, and capital to grow the young company further.
As you probably know, the Internal Revenue Service is the tax arm of the US Treasury Department. Unsurprisingly, valuation of businesses and other assets is of interest to the IRS. Through the years, the service has published a number of interpretations that have come to be widely supported in professional business appraisals.
These revenue rules, as they are called, do not have the force of law, representing instead the position the IRS takes toward business valuation best practices. As an example, regulatory guidelines may be used in the context of gift and estate tax laws that require appraisers to use specific valuation approaches or methods when valuing privately owned companies.
Some of the IRS publications are merely pronouncements with administrative authority. Again, they do not have the binding force of the law. Examples of these are the revenue rulings, private letter rulings, technical advice and general counsel memorandums.
As time went by, many of these publications were tested by courts in legal disputes. The case law that emerged lent support to some, but not all, IRS pronouncements. Some of the best known and supported IRS publications that stood the test of time are these:
Revenue Ruling 59-60
This publication is perhaps the best known IRS statement on valuation of private company ownership interests.
Deals with the fair market valuation of business intangible assets, including goodwill. The exposition of the so-called formula method is part of this paper.
Updates the Revenue Ruling 59-60 with specifics on intangible asset valuation.
Introduces the concept of lack of marketability and the restricted stock studies as a method to calculate the discounts for lack of marketability. If you are valuing a privately owned company whose stock is less marketable that shares of public companies, this is a very important point to consider.
Provides exposition of discounts for lack of control when valuing partial ownership interests in private companies. If you need to figure out the value of a partner’s share of business, the importance of control in business value estimation is something you should review carefully.
The private letter rulings (PLRs) and technical advice memorandums (TAMs) are the usual way the IRS responds to specific taxpayer inquiries. They are widely used for gift and estate tax valuations.
In general, you will find that many professional business valuations in the USA cite the IRS revenue rulings and other publications to enhance the credibility of appraisal. Remember, however, that the IRS guidelines are less compelling when valuation is done for non-tax purposes such as business sale situations.
If you are considering using the income based methods in your business valuation, you have two main choices: capitalization or discounting. In simple terms, the difference boils down to how you intend to treat the expected changes in business earnings going forward.
In using the discounted cash flow method, you specify the anticipated earnings explicitly in the calculation. On the other hand, the capitalization valuation implies that the business earnings will change at a constant rate in the future. This assumption is rarely met in the real world.
Capitalization also misses the timing of earnings changes. If your target company is likely to experience a rapid growth in earnings, especially early on, it’s best to use the discounting technique to capture it in your valuation.
On a general note, consider some situations that favor one choice of the valuation method over the other:
Steady, evenly growing earnings
If the rate at which the business earnings change is nearly constant then the capitalization of earnings is appropriate for valuation. The accuracy of your results likely would not improve if you used the more complex discounted cash flow technique.
Uneven change in business earnings expected
If you can generate a reliable earnings forecast with significant swings in the cash flow over the years, discounting will produce a more accurate result.
Significant change in earnings, uncertain timing
If your company’s cash flow is expected to change widely and timing of these changes is hard to predict, business risk is increased. The result is a higher discount rate. But since your earnings forecast is less reliable, the capitalization method is just as accurate in this situation.
Rapid business earnings growth over a short period
If your target company is experiencing a growth spurt that you can clearly forecast, use the discounted cash flow method. Once the company’s earnings settle into a more sustainable growth mode, you can make the assumption of constant growth rate in perpetuity. This is a perfect scenario for using the discounted cash flow valuation.
If you ask a business appraiser, you will hear: business value is in the eyes of the beholder. In formal jargon, business valuation results depend on the standard of value you use.
One of these standards is known as the intrinsic value. As the name implies, this is the measure of value one figures out by focusing on the fundamental characteristics that create value in a company. Note that this is very different than the fair market value that is often used by business people when comparing a company to other firms.
Intrinsic value is the price of business ownership that is determined by a valuation analyst following an in-depth or fundamental review of the company’s earning power, assets, and other value drivers.
In layman’s terms, the company’s intrinsic value is its true or real value, something that is revealed after careful consideration of all the value creating factors. An analyst setting out to figure out the company’s real worth will study its products, customer base, competitive position, relationships with suppliers, capital resources, management, skilled staff, among others.
When fair market value and intrinsic value converge
What happens if many serious investors do this analysis and arrive at pretty much the same value number? Now the intrinsic value becomes the company’s market value as these leading investors cast their votes by buying or selling company’s stock at a certain price.
Business valuation – foundation of sound investment
Figuring out intrinsic value for any business is no easy task. It is named fundamental analysis for a reason. If you really want to know what a company is worth, you roll up your sleeves and delve into a rigorous study of all the important elements that create or destroy value in the firm. Your investment decision is then guided by your conclusions: is the company’s stock priced higher, lower or in line with your findings?
Weeding out the hype
This lets you weed out market hype and inflated prices and zero in on value priced companies worth your while. The serious investor is rewarded with insight into promising companies before the market sentiment catches up. You get to hit pay dirt before the gold rush sets in.
Note that the legal definition of intrinsic value may differ from the economic concept. When in doubt and facing a legal challenge, check with your attorney on how the case law or local statutes see it.
Take a look at a professional business appraisal report and you will see the valuation date prominently displayed. Clearly, business appraisers deem this date worthy of mention. Why is this the case?
Business value changes over time
Business value can change quite a bit depending on circumstances that change over time. If you pay attention to the public stock market you will spot the ups and downs in prices as investors become aware of new company information and fluctuations in the economy.
An abrupt drop in company’s profits is a cause for concern and can depress its value significantly. If businesses can’t get required capital on attractive terms, their ability to invest for the future could be impaired. The result is often lower earnings and a drop in business value. A major customer departure could put a kink in a company’s sales and knock its value down.
Beware of valuation multiples that are out of date
If your valuation uses the market approach, comparison to similar companies should be done in a timely manner. Market comps depend critically on your ability to assess the current values of similar companies relative to their revenues, profits, asset bases or equity. As the market sentiment changes, so do the relationships between business financial performance and its value. Stale valuation multiples are one reason business valuations go south.
Business valuation repeated at different times
To make things even more interesting, your business valuation may be done as of several dates. This is common in divorce cases when the parties seek to establish how much business value has changed over the course of marriage of the business owners.
In the unhappy scenario of having to do a business appraisal for litigation, the court may determine what dates you should use. Before taking on the job, consider carefully whether you can do business valuation as of the dates the court wants. You may have little choice but to comply and your ability to complete the valuation engagement could prove critical to your client’s success.
Can you use financial ratio analysis in business valuation? If done correctly, this could be a helpful adjunct in your valuation. Specifically, reviewing financial ratios could help you spot the company’s strengths and weaknesses, and compare its performance to industry peers.
Here are the major groups of ratios to consider in valuing a company:
Short-term liquidity ratios such as current and quick ratio
Activity ratios including the inventory and accounts receivables turnover
Risk analysis figures such as business risk and degree of operating leverage
Balance sheet ratios indicating leverage and equity to asset ratios
Fixed charge coverage ratios, indicating sufficiency of cash flow to cover debt service
Return on investment ratios such as return on total assets and equity capital
You can take advantage of the financial ratios in your business value analysis in a number of ways. Selecting valuation multiples in calculating the company’s market value is one area. The multiples are typically calculated from a data set based on several comparable companies. Riskier businesses tend to be assigned lower valuation multiples, while the firms with better financial performance could command higher valuations.
If your subject company compares favorably in terms of key financial ratios, its value is likely to be at the high end of the range. For example, consistent, stable history of earnings is a good justification to pick higher valuation multiples based on EBIT or EBITDA earnings.
In general, the higher the level of business risk revealed by your financial ratio analysis, the lower the business value, whether calculated on the company’s revenues, assets, or other financial variables.
You can uncover important trends in company’s financial performance by examining the ratios over time. Such trend analysis can help you demonstrate how the company has improved or fallen back within the period. Since business value is a forward looking concept, such trends help you identify significant business risks likely to impact what the business is worth.
If you need to support your selection of valuation multiples, compare your company’s financial ratios to its industry peers. If the company shows strength relative to others, then higher valuation multiples are reasonable. On the other hand, poor financial performance should guide you to choose lower valuation multiples.