ValuAdder Business Valuation Blog

Economic uncertainty has returned to center stage. Inflation persists, credit is tightening, and corporate earnings momentum is fading. The Dow races one week and stumbles the next, while once‑buoyant M&A pipelines now feel sluggish.

For valuation professionals, this moment carries a haunting familiarity. Just before the 1929 crash, optimism masked systemic weakness – credit excesses, asset speculation, and overextended valuations. History whispers the same warnings now: how do you appraise value when the economy feels one shock away from a reset?

1929 vs. 2026: The Red Flags

The parallels to 1929 are no longer metaphorical; they are mathematical. Just before the Great Depression, the Shiller CAPE ratio sat at 32.5; today, it hovers near 40.

But there is a darker divergence: in 1929, the U.S. was a Producer Nation and a global creditor with a 16% debt-to-GDP ratio. Today, we are a Conspicuous Consumer, a global debtor at 124% debt-to-GDP, relying on a digital ledger that the rest of the world is likely to “stampede” away from.

The Red Flags are Waving in Plain Sight:

  • The Yield Curve Reality: 10-year Treasuries are no longer “safe havens” but “risk-bearing certificates” of a fiscal dominance crisis.
  • The Concentration Trap: 33% of global equity value is tied to a handful of tech firms that produce “code” but no “physicality.”
  • The Social Contract: Without a stable dollar, the “make a buck” cohesion of the U.S. is fracturing into an “every man for himself” tribalism.

Signals of Stress

The indicators echo the historic pattern:

  • Heavy leverage in corporate and consumer finance.
  • Earnings contraction underneath headline inflation.
  • Speculative pockets in tech and private assets.
  • Falling capital expenditures and rising default forecasts.

Traditional valuation methods assume dependable growth. But when volatility reigns, we must gauge resilience, not just performance.

The MDE Valuation Method

The Multiple of Discretionary Earnings (MDE) framework starts with Seller’s Discretionary Earnings (SDE) – the normalized owner benefit – and multiplies it by a multiple determined through 14 standardized value factors.

Each factor reflects how the business performs in the current market and macroeconomic realities:

  1. Earnings track record
  2. Industry growth
  3. Business growth
  4. Business financing
  5. Competition
  6. Location
  7. Customer concentration
  8. Product/service concentration
  9. Market concentration
  10. Nature of business
  11. Desirability
  12. Ease of operation
  13. Employees
  14. Management quality

Every attribute is scored relative to peers and market conditions, producing an aggregate factor multiplier between 0.1× SDE (a near‑worthless struggling firm) and 44× SDE (a best‑in‑class enterprise).

Two Companies, One SDE – Two Very Different Valuations

Consider two companies. Both have the same historical SDE of $500,000, yet their value factor profiles and resulting multipliers diverge dramatically.

Example 1 – The Bad News Company

Value Factor Observation Relative Strength 0.1 – 44
Earnings track record Erratic, margin compression 0.75
Industry growth Contracting sector 0.71
Business growth Negative trend 0.75
Business financing Debt service strain 0.75
Competition Intense, price based 0.75
Location Neutral 0.82
Customer concentration Two clients = 60% of sales 0.91
Product/service concentration Single line offering 0.91
Market concentration Limited region 0.96
Nature of business Low differentiation 0.81
Desirability Low buyer demand 0.88
Ease of operation Owner-dependent 0.88
Employees High turnover 0.88
Management quality Reactive, tactical 0.75

Composite Assessment: Weak across nearly every vector – fragile earnings, high risk, little defense against macro shocks.

Derived MDE Value Factor: 0.8× SDE (near the lower end of the continuum)

Valuation: $500,000 × 0.8 = $400,000

At less than 1 x SDE, this enterprise represents a credit‑squeezed, non‑scalable operation unlikely to attract capital or acquirers.

Example 2 – The “Rugged Survivor”

Value Factor Observation Relative Strength 0.1 – 44
Earnings track record Five-year consistency 12.7
Industry growth Stable niche with rising demand 13.5
Business growth Strong, organic 11
Business financing Zero debt, ample liquidity 11.6
Competition Differentiated and positioned 13.1
Location Strategic 12.8
Customer concentration Broad and balanced 12.5
Product/service concentration Diversified, complementary mix 11.9
Market concentration National footprint 14
Nature of business Essential, non-cyclical 15.3
Desirability High buyer appeal 14.8
Ease of operation Process-driven, systematized 12.7
Employees Skilled, long tenure 14
Management quality Visionary, succession in place 15.2

Composite Assessment: Highly durable, strategically financed, and positioned for expansion.

Derived MDE Value Factor: 12.8× SDE (upper‑quintile performer in this environment)

Valuation: $500,000 × 12.8 = $6,400,000

A big spread from the “bad news” firm – same SDE, but over 16 times the value due to superior positioning and resilience.

What the Spread Reveals

The MDE framework exposes what traditional multiples obscure: markets reward adaptability, not just profit. When macro conditions deteriorate, every structural weakness expands the discount while robust fundamentals command premiums.

A disciplined score‑based approach ensures valuation professionals quantify risk and quality across a standardized spectrum, from the fragile 0.1× underperformers to the elite 44× “Hall of Famers.” And in an era echoing 1929, clarity and consistency may be your most valuable assets.

See Valuation Tour